There is no easy solution, to the problem, which follows from the principle of majority rule, in Company law, that of protecting the minority shareholders from violation of their rights.


A common scenario, is where a majority shareholder, treats the Company as his own, and acts accordingly, to the detriment of the other shareholders, or where there is a breakdown in the relationship of the shareholders or any of their number, which gives rise to questions about the future ownership and control of the Company.




Under Cyprus Law, the minority shareholders are afforded the following remedies:


(1) Personal Action


If the majority shareholders, violate a personal right of a minority shareholder, then he can file a personal action against the wrongdoers to rectify such a violation (i.e. violation of the articles of association of the Company or of the terms of any shareholder agreement etc.).


(2) Derivative Action


In certain circumstances, a minority shareholder, may bring a common law derivative action, on behalf of the Company, against the wrongdoers, who committed a wrong to the Company.
Wrongdoers can be shareholders and directors of the Company, as well as third parties. In order to be able to proceed with a derivative action at common law, the minority shareholder(s) must persuade the Cyprus Courts, that the Companys (that is the majority’s) decision not to pursue a remedy for the wrong done to the Company, against the wrongdoers amounts to a “fraud on the minority” i.e. the Court must conclude, that the decision of the majority, was not made in good faith, and for the benefit of the Company, as a whole).

Any fruits of a derivative action, belong to the Company, which shall be joined as a nominal defendant to the Derivative action. A Derivative action can be combined with a personal action, in the same writ of summons.


(3) Statutory remedy of petition to winding up of the Company on a just and equitable ground.


Section 211 of the Companies Laws, CAP. 113 (“the Law”), secures the right of any shareholder of a Cyprus Company, to petition the winding up or dissolution of the Company – (before the Court of the district where the Company has its registered office) – on the just and equitable ground.

The “just and equitable ground” has been interpreted by Courts, as to cover inter alia deadlock situations, lack of trust and confidence on the management, oppressive conduct of the majority over the minority, fraud on the minority etc.

In order a shareholder to be entitled to exercise such a right, he shall be a registered member or shareholder of the Company, at least six months period, before the date of filing of such a petition.

It has been held by Cypriot Courts, that such a statutory right of a shareholder, can not be restricted or limited, by any contract (i.e. shareholders agreement containing arbitration clauses or other foreign jurisdiction clauses).

The petitioner might be precluded from filing such a petition, if he comes before Court with unclean hands (i.e. if he was responsible for the deadlock, or if he committed the wrongs, or he was party to the wrongs etc.).

(4) Statutory alternative remedy to winding up in cases of oppression.


Under Section 202 of the Law, any member of the Company, who complains that the affairs of the Company are being conducted in a manner oppressive, to some part of the members (including himself), may apply to the Court for an order:


(a) To restrain the commission of any such act, or continuance of any such conduct;

(b) That proceedings be brought in the name of the Company;

(c) For the appointment of a receiver or manager, of the whole, or part of a Company’s property, or business;

(d) For the regulation of the conduct of the affairs of the Company, in the future (i.e. for the appointment of an independent director, in order to break a deadlock in the management of the Company, or the amendment of the articles of association of the Company, in order the affairs of the company to be conducted not in an oppressive manner etc.).

(e) For the purchase of the shares of any members of the Company, by other members of the Company, or by the Company itself.

The Courts have jurisdiction to issue such an alternative remedy, only if:

(a) The Court is of the opinion, that the affairs of the Company have been conducted in a manner oppressive, to inter alia the applicant/ shareholder.

(b) That to wind up the Company, would unfairly prejudice inter alia that applicant/shareholder, but otherwise the facts would justify the making of a winding up order, on the ground that, it was just and equitable that the Company should be wound up.


(5) Statutory remedy to apply for appointment of investigators or inspectors, to investigate the affairs of the Company.


An oppressed shareholder can:


(a) Either apply by a formal letter to the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Cyprus, for the appointment of Inspectors to investigate the affairs of the Company; or
(b) To petition such appointment of inspectors by the competent Court.

Provided that such an appointment is effected by either the Council of Ministers, or by the Court, any report of such Inspectors can be used or forwarded by either the Council of Ministers or the Court to the office of the Attorney General of the Republic, for the initiation of criminal proceedings against the wrongdoers, if the findings contained in the Report, support same.




Limited Liability Companies, which are, in practical terms, run, as if they were a partnership, between the persons who are shareholders of same, might be regarded by the law, as “quasi partnership”.
The significance of the status of a “quasi partnership”, is that the Courts are, general speaking, more willing to give certain additional rights to minority shareholders, in those Companies.

In particular, a minority shareholder in a “quasi partnership” who has been involved in the management of the business of the Company, can often claim protection from being ousted or excluded, from such management of the affairs of the Company (without good reasons).


(7) Interim relief or Protection


In the context of any legal action, taken by a minority shareholder, he can apply for the issue of interim relief or protection, until the final hearing of his main action.

Such interim relief covers inter alia:


(a) Freezing injunctions blocking assets of wrongdoers, or of the Company.

(b) Interim orders, blocking inter alia convention of shareholders meetings, meetings of Board of Directors, realization or implementation of resolutions taken by shareholders meetings or directors meeting etc.

(c) Appointment of an Interim Receiver or Manager, over the whole or part of the assets or business of the Company.

(d) Norwich Pharmakal Orders or discovery orders for the disclosure of information and documents by third parties which have been innocently or not involved in the wrongdoings.

(e) Anton Piller orders to protect or preserve evidence to be used at trial etc.

(f) Chambra Type Orders to block assets of wrongdoers who are held on the names of third parties.

(g) Orders for the disclosure on oath of the location and value of assets of defendants.

(h) Gagging Orders to block a third party or a defendant, not to disclose to the defendants wrongdoers, the initiation or the existence of the legal action filed until the applicant obtains all the documents or information to be disclosed to trace the stolen assets etc.




For further information on this topic please contact

Mr. Soteris Pittasspittas@pittaslegal.com ) at SOTERIS PITTAS & CO LLC,

by telephone (+357 25 028460) or by fax (+357 25 028461)



The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advise should be sought about your specific circumstances.


Tuesday, 13 December 2011 19:36

LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND COURTS • Arbitration in Austria has a remarkable tradition. The first arbitration institutions were set   up as early as 1883. • Austria has a modern arbitration law up to...

Saturday, 10 December 2011 01:38

  1. Court System   What is the structure of the civil court system? There are two tiers of courts in Cyprus, i.e., the Supreme Court and the subordinate courts.   The Supreme Court The...

Wednesday, 07 December 2011 00:43

There is no easy solution, to the problem, which follows from the principle of majority rule, in Company law, that of protecting the minority shareholders from violation of their rights.   A...

Tuesday, 06 December 2011 19:33

Many fraud cases involve complex corporate structures, incorporated in various jurisdictions some of which might cause obstacles or create problems for victims. Cyprus Courts, have jurisdiction to...

Thursday, 01 December 2011 00:31

  Contributed by Soteris Pittas of SOTERIS PITTAS & CO LLC December 28th, 2009   By a recent decision of a Cyprus First Instance Court, a winding up petition lodged by a holder of an...

Thursday, 01 December 2011 00:06

INTRODUCTION   Cyprus Courts, have jurisdiction to issue any interim order, in all cases, in which it appears to the Court, just and convenient to do so, provided that the following conditions are...

Thursday, 01 December 2011 00:03

Due to the accession of the Republic of Cyprus in the European Community (“EU”), Cyprus is bound by the provisions of inter alia the EU Regulation 44/2001, on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and...

Thursday, 01 December 2011 00:01

  The foundation of the relationship between a lawyer and his Client, in the effective representation by a lawyer of his Client’s interests, is the privilege of confidentiality.   The...

Wednesday, 30 November 2011 23:58

Очень часто бизнесмены, создавая совместные предприятия и подписывая акционерные соглашения либо соглашения о совместной деятельности, не совсем точно осознают последствия созданных контрактов....

Wednesday, 30 November 2011 19:38

Июль-Август 2007 № 14(123) Страницы 52-56 В чем польза трастов зарегистрированных на Кипре Активный Курорт Уровень развития российской экономики дает бизнесменам неплохие возможности размещать...

Sunday, 27 November 2011 00:32

Contributed by Soteris Pittas of SOTERIS PITTAS & CO LLC   Anti-Suit Injunctions December 28th, 2009   In a recent decision a Cyprus First Instance Court issued an anti-suit injunction...

Sunday, 27 November 2011 00:24

OPEN-ENDED UNDERTAKINGS FOR COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT IN TRANSFERABLE SECURITIES (“UCITS”) 1.1 UCITS   The UCITS law 200(1)/2004 (“the Law”) which implements the EU directives provides the legal...

Saturday, 26 November 2011 00:18

INTERNATIONAL MULTILATERAL CONVENTIONS 1. Is your country a contracting state to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards? Since December 1980, Cyprus...

Monday, 21 November 2011 00:11

INTRODUCTION   Cyprus, has adopted the Anglo-Saxon legal system which allows most of English cases to be cited in Cypriot Courts. Under certain conditions, the cases are treated as binding, but in...

Thursday, 17 November 2011 00:14

ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD UNDER NEW YORK CONVENTION Contributed by Soteris Pittas of SOTERIS PITTAS & CO LLC 31st October 2007   In a very recent decision, a Cyprus District...

Friday, 23 September 2011 01:36

Contributed by Soteris Pittas of SOTERIS PITTAS & CO LLC September 23rd, 2010   In a recent decision of a Cyprus Court, it has been held that an applicant cannot abuse the machinery of the...

Friday, 23 September 2011 01:34

Contributed by Soteris Pittas of SOTERIS PITTAS & CO LLC September 23rd, 2010   In a recent decision of a Cyprus District Court, it has been decided that an international arbitral award,...

Thursday, 14 April 2011 01:39

In Pell Frischmann Consultants Ltd v. the Republic of Cyprus the Supreme Court decided, among other things, that Law 101/87, which adopted the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law...

Subscribe to our Publications

We are dedicated to providing our clients with outstanding, highly personalized, legal representation.
Chrysanthou Mylona 10 
3030 - Limassol, Cyprus
© Soteris Pittas & Co LLC. All Rights Reserved.