CYPRUS: SERVICE OF JUDICIAL AND EXTRAJUDICIAL DOCUMENTS IN CIVIL AND COMMERICIAL MATTERS AS PER REGULATION (EC) No 1393/2007

CYPRUS: SERVICE OF JUDICIAL AND EXTRAJUDICIAL DOCUMENTS IN CIVIL AND COMMERICIAL MATTERS AS PER REGULATION (EC) No 1393/2007

 

The cooperation between the judicial authorities of the Member States of the European Union is a cornerstone for a European area of freedom, security and justice and is particularly necessary to ensure effective service of judicial and extrajudicial documents between Member States in civil or commercial matters as per the European Regulation 1393/2007. The service of judicial and extrajudicial document is part of every court case. Therefore, fast and secure delivery of documents is vital for the proper administration of justice and protection of rights of the parties in litigation proceedings.

 

The Regulation provides for methods of sending documents abroad either directly to the recipient or to the relevant authorities of the receiving State establishing a main mode of transmission including the intervention of three agencies: the transmitting agency, the receiving agency and the central body. However there are also alternatives offered including transmission by consular or diplomatic channels; service by diplomatic or consular channels; service by postal channel; and direct service between competent authorities. A crucial issue, however, is that the Regulation does not define the concept of judicial or extrajudicial documents; therefore this is exclusively within the jurisdiction of domestic law for the determination of each Member State.

The above matter has come before the Supreme Court in Cyprus, in the case of CONSORTIA EUROPE LTD AND FREGATA HOLDINGS LTD (No.387/2011), in which the Judge Mr. Nathanail made an interpretation of the Regulation and its impact on Order 6 Rule 6. Permission was given in this case to the plaintiffs to serve both the writ and the application for an injunction outside jurisdiction to the defendant company in the United Kingdom as per the provisions of the Regulation. However the appellant-defendant company appealed against such a decision on the main basis that notice of the writ was not served as provided in Order 6 Rule 6 in cases of service out of the jurisdiction. The First Instance court dismissed the application holding that the regulation regulates the direct service of documents abroad and underlined that notice of writ under Order 6 Rule 6 no longer applies having in consideration the fact that it was established in previous times and that it should be considered as repealed by the Regulation which has increased force over such matters. This has also been reaffirmed in a recent judgment on Civil Appeal 113/2012 V.K.C. QUALITY INVESTMENTS LTD v. SHAMUSSI-DEEN ALABI, SHITTA BEY where the Supreme Court of Cyprus reaffirmed that EU Regulation 1393/2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters is prevalent over domestic Civil Procedure Rules.

However the Supreme Court in this case carefully examined this issue and came to the conclusion that the decision of the First Instance Court repealing Order 6 Rule 6 due to the existence of the Regulation removes the defence provided in the Civil Procedure Rules given to the recipient for the service of documents, who is obliged to appear in the territory of the Republic, to defend himself. Nowhere in the Regulation is there a requirement for service of the writ instead of a notice of the writ, and therefore the Court of First Instance decision that the Regulation has implicitly repealed Order 6 Rule 6, is not true. It was also stated that as regards to the infringement of Order 48 Rule 13, which requires the service to be issued along with the order issued after an ex parte application, with the ex parte application itself, along with the accompanying affidavit, the only thing left to be stressed is the fact that the wording makes it clear and compelling, and there can be no deviation from this. Therefore, the appeal succeeded and the first instance judgment was set aside.

 

 

 

 

 

For further information on this topic please contact Ms. Nada Starovlah at

SOTERIS PITTAS & CO LLC, by telephone (+357 25 028460) or by fax (+357 25 028461)

or by e-mail (nstarovlah@pittaslegal.com).

 

 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advise should be sought about your specific circumstances.

PUBLICATIONS 2014

Wednesday, 10 December 2014 13:07

CYPRUS: ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTIONS GRANTED BY CYPRUS COURTS FOLLOWING WEST TANKERS   For long the traditional approach of English courts had been to protect the sanctity of agreements between parties...

Tuesday, 18 November 2014 15:06

CYPRUS: SERVICE OF JUDICIAL AND EXTRAJUDICIAL DOCUMENTS IN CIVIL AND COMMERICIAL MATTERS AS PER REGULATION (EC) No 1393/2007   The cooperation between the judicial authorities of the Member States...

Thursday, 13 November 2014 10:09

Cyprus India Relations. Cyprus may no longer be a tax optimised route for Indian funds or may it?   A publication in the Economic Times has caused much debate in India since after blacklisting...

Thursday, 23 October 2014 16:42

WHERE DOES MANAGMENT AND CONROL LIE?               This short note is dedicated to the test of residency in Cyprus for the purposes of taxation. It should be kept in mind that the test of...

Wednesday, 15 October 2014 12:33

CYPRUS: JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND COURT PROCEDURE     JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND COURT PROCEDURE   LITIGATION              ...

Wednesday, 03 September 2014 11:30

CYPRUS: SERVICE OF WRIT OF SUMMONS TODEFENDANT FOREIGN COMPANIES, WHICH HAVE CYPRIOT RESIDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE AFTER OBTAINING LEAVE TO SERVE OUTSIDE THE...

Friday, 25 July 2014 13:00

   ASSET PROTECTION & CYPRUS INTERNATIONAL TRUSTS A.      WHAT DOES ASSET PRTECTION MEAN? Asset protection is the adoption of advance planning strategies which place, in a legal and...

Monday, 21 July 2014 15:24

Cyprus: A holder of an International Arbitral Award, before its registration in Cyprus, under the New York Convention, cannot be regarded as a “Creditor”, within the meaning of Section 212 of the...

Monday, 21 July 2014 15:23

Cyprus: The issue whether a person, is signatory to an arbitration agreement, shall be decided by the Arbitrators, and not a state Court. Only in clear cases, such an issue shall be decided by...

Monday, 21 July 2014 15:21

Cyprus: As a general principle, the mere fact that there are multiple parties and multiple issues, which are inter-related and some, but not all, defendants are bound by an arbitration clause, is...

Monday, 30 June 2014 15:35

District Court of Nicosia Rules that a Russian Court Creditor Cannot Seek Directly its Enforcement Against Foreign Defendants   30 June 2014   The District Court of...

Friday, 07 March 2014 12:49

CYPRUS: CORPORATE TAXATION - IMPORTANT PRACTICAL QUIDELINES IN ASCERTAINING THE PLACE OF EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OR PLACE OF MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF A CYPRUS...

Friday, 07 March 2014 12:29

CYPRUS: ENFORCEMENT OF RUSSIA JUDGMENTS IN CYPRUS .   In all cases, where Russian Banks have claims against Russian citizens, pursuant to loan agreements, or guarantees, the Russian...

Friday, 07 March 2014 09:16

  DO YOU HAVE A “CHANGE OF CONTROL” IN YOUR SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT?   In the recent English case McKillen –v- Misland (Cyprus) Investments Ltd (2012) the Court decided that, a principle...

Subscribe to our Publications

Image
We are dedicated to providing our clients with outstanding, highly personalized, legal representation.
Chrysanthou Mylona 10 
3030 - Limassol, Cyprus
© Soteris Pittas & Co LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Image