CYPRUS: ENFORCEMENT AND REGISTRATION OF AN UKRAINIAN JUDGMENT

 

CYPRUS: ENFORCEMENT AND REGISTRATION OF AN UKRAINIAN JUDGMENT AND THE POSSIBILITY OF OBTAINING INTERIM RELIEF IN AID OF EXECUTION

 

INTRODUCTION

The registration and enforcement of an Ukrainian judgment, in the Republic of Cyprus, is regulated by the provisions of the Bilateral Agreement, between Cyprus and Ukraine (Law 8 (III)/2005 (“the Treaty”).

 

SCOPE OF THE TREATY AS TO REGOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT:

Article 20 of the Treaty provides that each contracting party, shall recognize and enforce in its territory, the following decisions, given in the territory of the other contracting party:

 

a) Court decisions in civil matters, including family matters ;

b) Court decisions in criminal matters, concerning damages ;

c) Amicable settlements, approved by Court in civil matters

 

CONDITIONS OF RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT

Article 21 of the Treaty, provides that a decision referred to in Article 20 of the Treaty, shall be recognized and enforced, provided that:

 

a) It is final and if it is enforceable by means of execution, under the law of the Contracting Party in the territory of which it was given;
b) In the case of a decision given in the absence of the defendant, he was duly notified on the institution of proceedings and the place, date and time of the hearing in accordance with the law of the Contracting Party in the territory of which the decision was given;

c) No decision, which became final, was earlier given on the same subject matter between the same parties by a court of the requested Contracting Party;

d) Proceedings between the same parties on the same subject-matter were not instituted before a court of the requested Contracting party before the proceedings in which the decision in question was given;

e) The recognition or enforcement of the decision would not be contrary to the public order of the requested Contracting Party;


f) The decision or its effects would not be contrary to the fundamental principles and any law of the requested Contracting Party;

g) The decision is not given by a court without jurisdiction according to the provisions of Article 17.

 

APPLICATION FOR RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT

Article 22 of the Treaty provides as follows:

 

1. The application for the recognition and enforcement of a decision, may be submitted by a party directly to the Court, of the requested Contracting Party, or to the Court of the Contracting Party, which issued the decision, and the said Court shall transmit the application, in the manner prescribed in Article 2 (3) of the Treaty (i.e. through the Ministry of Justice).

2. The application for recognition and enforcement shall be accompanied by:

a) A Certified Copy of the decision, including a document, stating that is final and if the request concerns enforceability, that it is enforceable, unless it is indicated in the decision itself.

b) Confirmation that the party failed to appear, and take part in the proceedings, and against whom, the decision was given, was duly notified about the commencement of the legal proceedings, the place, the date and time of the hearing according to the law of the Contracting Party, in the territory of which the decision was issued.

3. The application and documents referred to in paragraph 2 above, shall also be accompanied by a certified translation into the language of the requested Contracting Party, or in English.

 

PROCEDURE
 
Article 23 provides:

 

1. That the Contracting Parties shall apply their respective national laws as to the procedure for recognition and enforcement of decision.

2. The Court which examing an application for recognition and enforcement, shall confine itself to establishing the conditions stipulated in Article 21.

3. The Court shall decide without undue delay, any application for recognition and enforcement of decision.     

 

POSSIBILITY OF OBTAINING INTERIM RELIEF IN THE CONTEXT OF APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT:
   
An applicant, seeking the registration and enforcement in the Republic of Cyprus of an Ukrainian judgment, under the Treaty -( provided the applicant files his application for recognition and enforcement, directly before Cyprus courts)-  is entitled to apply for the issue of the following inter alia interim relief:

 

a) Freezing orders, blocking assets held by the judgment debtor;

b) Chambra injunctions, blocking assets beneficially owned by judgment debtor, but held into the name of third parties;

c) Discovery or Norwich Pharmakal orders, ordering third parties (Banks, Service providers etc) to disclose information and documents in order to assist the Claimant, to prove and plead his case, to trace assets, to identify other wrongdoers etc;

d) Gagging orders, blocking a third party (i.e. Bank, Service provider) not to alert the defendant, about the commencement of the legal proceedings by the Claimant;

e) Appointment of an interim receiver to assist in the preservation of the assets blocked by an injunction; and

f) Appointment of a receiver by way of equitable execution, in order to assist in the execution of the judgment, against the assets, which are beneficially owned by the judgment debtor.     

 

 

 

For further information on this topic please contact

Mr. Soteris Pittas( spittas@pittaslegal.com ) at SOTERIS PITTAS & CO LLC,

by telephone (+357 25 028460) or by fax (+357 25 028461)

 

 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advise should be sought about your specific circumstances.

 

PUBLICATIONS 2012

Tuesday, 13 November 2012 00:51

  Cyprus and Ukraine signed a new bilateral tax agreement for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion that when in force will replace the existing Tax Bilateral tax...

Tuesday, 16 October 2012 19:21

  CYPRUS: Dispute arising out from a Shareholders Agreement containing an arbitration clause - Applicability of Law 101/87 adopting in the Republic of Cyprus of the Uncitral Model Law on...

Tuesday, 16 October 2012 19:20

CYPRUS: Anti-Suit Injunction issued by Arbitral Tribunal in an LCIA arbitration case conducted in London, prohibiting the commencement and/or continuation of legal proceedings before Cyprus...

Monday, 10 September 2012 19:24

The legality of a third party litigation funding, has not yet been examined by Cypriot Courts.   If such an issue, is raised, Cypriot Courts will look for guidance on English or other common law...

Tuesday, 24 July 2012 19:27

  CYPRUS: ENFORCEMENT AND REGISTRATION OF AN UKRAINIAN JUDGMENT AND THE POSSIBILITY OF OBTAINING INTERIM RELIEF IN AID OF EXECUTION   INTRODUCTION The registration and enforcement of an...

Friday, 20 July 2012 20:07

Cyprus Companies are in wide use as major vehicles in international tax structuring mainly due to the broad range of legal and tax related benefits they can offer because of the flexible tax system...

Monday, 09 July 2012 19:37

In the TASSARRUF MEVDUATI SEGORTA FONU -v- MERRIL LYNCH BANK AND TRUST COMPANY (CAYMAN) LTD & OTHERS (2011) UKPC 17, the Privy Council, permitted the appointment of an equitable receiver, to...

Tuesday, 29 May 2012 19:45

INTRODUCTION Cyprus does not have a formal policy towards the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.  The question whether a foreign judgment can be enforced in Cyprus, depends solely by...

Tuesday, 29 May 2012 19:43

District Court of Limassol Rules that Fraudulent Disposal of Assets of a Ukrainian Company Cannot be Trumped by the "Exclusive Jurisdiction” of Article 22 of the Brussels Regulation   18 May...

Wednesday, 02 May 2012 19:48

The Republic of Cyprus is a Contracting party to New York Convention.   Since December 1980 the Republic of Cyprus, has been a contracting party to the New York Convention, on the recognition,...

Wednesday, 02 May 2012 19:46

INTRODUCTION    The registration and enforcement of a Russian judgment in the Republic of Cyprus is regulated by the provisions of the Bilateral Agreement, between Cyprus and the Russian...

Wednesday, 08 February 2012 18:51

The existence and nature of piratical attacks off Somalia, is a matter of great notoriety and has caused tremendous problems to ship-owners, cargo-owners, insurers, crew members etc.  Due to the...

Monday, 30 January 2012 18:58

In the recent case PENDERHIL HOLDINGS LTD –V- IOANNI KLOUKINA,  the Supreme Court of Cyprus, examined whether a stay can be granted of the enforcement of Norwich Pharmacal orders, pending...

Monday, 30 January 2012 18:57

In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Cyprus, it has been held, that a derivative action filed by a minority shareholder of a Cyprus company, did not fall within the ambit of an arbitration...

Monday, 30 January 2012 18:55

In the context of an application to register and enforce a Russian judgment, pursuant  to the terms of the bilateral treaty, existing between the Republic of Cyprus and Russia, our firm succeeded to...

Tuesday, 10 January 2012 19:41

All jurisdictions apply particular limitation periods for an action to be filed. In Cyprus limitation periods where set out in the Limitation of Actions Law, Cap 15 ("Limitations Law"), which was...

Tuesday, 10 January 2012 18:53

The Council of Ministers issued recently its Decision setting new criteria and conditions for the Naturalization of Foreign Investors / Entrepreneurs by Exemption on the basis of para. 2(f) of the...

Subscribe to our Publications

Image
We are dedicated to providing our clients with outstanding, highly personalized, legal representation.
Chrysanthou Mylona 10 
3030 - Limassol, Cyprus
© Soteris Pittas & Co LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Image