The exemption of a judge shall not be unreasonable or unjustified

The Supreme Court exercising its jurisdiction based on the Administration of Justice (Various Provisions) (Amendment) Law of 2022, Law 145(I)/2022 and Article 9(3)(e) considered an application for exemption of a judge who, prior to her appointment as a judge, worked in the Law Office of one of the parties and was a colleague of the lawyer handling the case. The Supreme Court, based on the testimony presented, decided that the average citizen, a fair-minded and informed observer, knows that the Judge had no involvement in the case, and dismissed the application for exemption.

 

In the event that it was presented that the Judge had, then, discussed the case with her colleague or with anyone else, then the question of her exclusion would have been judged on a different basis.

 

The Court emphasized that the need for transparency and protection of the rights of the parties shall not lead the judge to an unreasonable or, unjustified waiver of his duty to adjudicate on the case assigned to him, nor to the recognition of a party’s right to choose the judge, who will adjudicate his case.

 

 

 

 

For further information on this topic please contact

Mrs. Anna Lamprou( alamprou@pittaslegal.com ) at SOTERIS PITTAS & CO LLC,

by telephone (+357 25 028460) or by fax (+357 25 028461)

 

 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advise should be sought about your specific circumstances.

 

 

PUBLICATIONS 2024

Wednesday, 15 May 2024 13:23

The Supreme Court exercising its jurisdiction based on the Administration of Justice (Various Provisions) (Amendment) Law of 2022, Law 145(I)/2022 and Article 9(3)(e) considered an application for...

Thursday, 04 April 2024 08:53

On July 1, 2023, the Procedure Rules of the Supreme Court of 2023 were published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Cyprus and entered into force. According to the said Procedure Rules, from...

Friday, 23 February 2024 09:18

The Supreme Court examining the appeal case No. 298/2014 between Α.Α.Ι. v Dr. M.CH, filed by a patient against a doctor, set aside the first instance Court decision on, inter alia, the ground that...

Thursday, 07 September 2023 11:56

In a recent decision, the Court recognized its power to appoint a Receiver by a way of equitable execution of a judgment.   The case concerned an Application to extend the powers of the Interim...

Thursday, 06 July 2023 09:26

In the very recent decision of Re Mosaica Investments Limited, Petition No. 573/2022 DC. Nicosia, Interim Decision dated 21.02.2023, in the context of a by summons application filed by the...

Wednesday, 28 June 2023 09:47

In a recent case, handled by our law firm, on behalf of a judgment creditor, the District Court of Limassol, upon the application of the judgment creditor – (and after a contested hearing) – issued...

Tuesday, 06 June 2023 11:03

In a very recent case concerning an application for registration, recognition and enforcement of a Partial Final LCIA Arbitral Award in Cyprus, the Cypriot court was called to examine whether the...

Tuesday, 09 May 2023 09:51

In the very recent decision of Re Mosaica Investments Limited, Petition No. 573/2022 DC. Nicosia, Interim Decision dated 21.02.2023, the Cypriot Court, by following relevant English and Cypriot...

Subscribe to our Publications

Image
We are dedicated to providing our clients with outstanding, highly personalized, legal representation.
Chrysanthou Mylona 10 
3030 - Limassol, Cyprus
© Soteris Pittas & Co LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Image